Legal Opinion

State v. Cummings

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, J.

The primary question for decision herein is whether a royalty interest in land from which oil was actually being produced was legally assessable for ad valorem taxes in the years 1941 to 1943. Secondary questions are involved and will be developed later in the opinion.

Appellee, Barbour, during said years, and appellee, Cummings, through the years 1942 and 1943, owned such an interest in separate tracts in the Tinsley oil field in Yazoo County, this State, which interests were assessed for ad valorem taxes for the respective years, and which taxes the parties paid without protest. Barbour was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stone v. McKay Plumbing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Stern v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Reedy v. Johnson's EstateMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hendrix v. FooteMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Gulf Refining Co. v. StoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Jackson Mun. Airport Auth.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  2. James L. Anderson, Jr., a Minor, by and Through James H. Doss, Uncle and Next Friend v. Jackson Municipal Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. State v. Wilbe Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  4. James L. Anderson, Jr., a Minor, by and Through James H. Doss, Uncle and Next Friend v. Jackson Municipal Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. James L. Anderson, Jr., a Minor, by and Through James H. Doss, Uncle and Next Friend v. Jackson Municipal Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API