Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Board of Education v. Illinois State Board of Education

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1987No. 86—0116Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE JIGANTI,

specially concurring:

While I agree with the result in the case, I disagree with my colleagues’ discussions concerning the first issue in the case. The majority opinion states that “[t]he parties disagree on which of them deserves our deference: plaintiff or the hearing officer.” I see no disagreement. The plaintiff, the board of education for School District No. 151, complains that the trial court in considering its arguments stated that “none of the findings of the hearing officer can be said to be against the manifest weight of the evidence.” It is the plaintiff’s position…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kensington Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. General Motors Corp. v. BowlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. General Motors Corp. v. BowlingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API