White v. Hulls
Montana Supreme Court
Appeals from District Court, Gallatin County; Ben. B. Law, Judge. Action by Charles T. White against Mary Y. Hulls and another, and against G. S. Black and others, resulting in decree partly for and partly adverse to plaintiff, and from an order denying his motion for new trial, he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen
These two appeals were taken from the order of the district court denying appellant’s motion for a new trial and were, by order of the court, consolidated, as exactly the same issues are involved in each appeal.
Prior to the commencement of the trial in the lower court, the appellant dismissed as to the respondents Merchants’ Bank of Winona, Mary A. Cox, and the Sanborn Company. The cases were by agreement tried together before a jury, and findings of fact, conclusions of law and decree were made in each *100case upon identically the same evidence, save and except the differences in the amount of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waite v. Shoemaker & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Franklin v. SchultzMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Littrell v. WilcoxMontana Supreme Court · 1891
- Hostetler v. EcclesOregon Supreme Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. FoxMontana Supreme Court · 1977
- State Bank v. PewMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Andriola v. MilliganNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Erlandson v. ErskineMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Marvin v. HargraveMontana Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.