Moran Bros. Contracting Co. v. City of New York
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtGarside, J.
This is a motion by the defendant, City of New York, to dismiss the complaint herein pursuant to the provisions of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground that the second, third and fourth defenses are sufficient as a matter of law. The court holds that the fourth defense, viz., the Statute of Limitations, is not sufficient as a matter of law. This conclusion appears inescapable in view of the record and the decision of the Appellate Term hereinafter described which authorized the commencement of a new action. There remain for consideration the second and third defenses.
In…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sweet v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Crouch v. . GutmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Doll v. . NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Wright v. . ReusensNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Johnson v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.