Legal Opinion

State v. Dole

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Vermillion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtM’Kinney, J.

Indictment for'suffering gaming in a licensed grocery. The' indictment was quashed by the Circuit Court, because the particular game suffered and permitted to be played in the .grocery,; was not stated. •

The penalties imposed, by the 65th section of the act relative to crimes and punishments, upon a tavern-keeper, or retailer .of spirituous liquors, &c., are-incurred by suffering a game to be played by' which money, or any article of value, is lost or won, and not by suffering a particular game to be played, since all games for such purposes appear to be equally prohibited. -In the cases of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. LamptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  2. State v. PancakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Schmidt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. State v. LaneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1850

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API