State v. Dole
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Vermillion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtM’Kinney, J.
Indictment for'suffering gaming in a licensed grocery. The' indictment was quashed by the Circuit Court, because the particular game suffered and permitted to be played in the .grocery,; was not stated. •
The penalties imposed, by the 65th section of the act relative to crimes and punishments, upon a tavern-keeper, or retailer .of spirituous liquors, &c., are-incurred by suffering a game to be played by' which money, or any article of value, is lost or won, and not by suffering a particular game to be played, since all games for such purposes appear to be equally prohibited. -In the cases of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. LamptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- State v. PancakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Schmidt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. LaneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1850