Legal Opinion

Emerich v. Bourland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1923Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

During the year 1907 an improvement district, known as Waterworks Improvement District No. 1, was formed in the city of Fort Smith, pursuant to general statutes, for the purpose of acquiring and operating a waterworks plant which had theretofore been built and operated by a private corporation. ■ There was a special statute expressly authorizing such acquisition by the district thus formed. The territory of that district was coextensive with the city limits as then existent, but the city limits were subsequently extended, and a large territory added to the city.

Later, another district, known…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boles v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Sembler v. Water & Light Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Bd. of Improvement of Gravette Waterworks Improvement District v. CarmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API