Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 10, 1984No. 83-1811PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESTER, M. IGNATIUS, Associate Judge.

The sole question presented in this appeal is whether the evidence as to the value of the steering boxes taken from Bud’s Auto Parts was sufficient to sustain the conviction of the defendant/appellant, Jose Ramirez, for grand larceny.

The appellant contended that the State presented no evidence as to the personal knowledge of the steering boxes, their condition, and what vehicles they came from. The appellant argues that in the absence of such proof the conviction of grand larceny must be reversed.

The appellant urges that the proof of value was an essential…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Negron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Jefferson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovette v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Freeman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. E.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API