Moyer v. . Hinman
New York Court of Appeals
In October, 1835, H. W. Schroeppel being the owner' of two hundred and fifty acres of land, situate in Oswego county, contracted with the plaintiff to sell and convey to him a part of it containing sixty acres, at the price of $465; fifty dollars of the purchase price to be paid down, and the residue at or before the expiration of ten years with annual interest.
Read the full summary
In October, 1835, H. W. Schroeppel being the owner' of two hundred and fifty acres of land, situate in Oswego county, contracted with the plaintiff to sell and convey to him a part of it containing sixty acres, at the price of $465; fifty dollars of the purchase price to be paid down, and the residue at or before the expiration of ten years with annual interest. By the contract it was agreed that the plaintiff should have immediate possession of the premises, arid on payment of the purchase money, the same should be conveyed to him in fee by Schroeppel. The following spring the plaintiff…
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The counsel for the parties in this case agree that the plaintiff, being in possession under his contract at the time of docketing the judgment under which the defendant claims, is to be protected in equity as to his rights which existed at that time; and the position is so well established by authority as to have become an…
2Cited by38 opinions
- May v. EmersonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Phillis v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Milner v. HylandIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Reid v. GormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Carley v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1941
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.