Aiken v. Richardson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Proceedings on money rules are controlled by chapter 24-2 of the Code of Georgia, providing that a judge of the superior court, upon application, may grant a rule nisi containing a full statement of the case in which the -officer is called upon to show cause; *184that in answer to- this rule the officer ruled shall fully respond in writing and under oath; that thereafter the movant of the rule may traverse the truth of such answer and, when such traverse is filed, an issue is joined which shall be tried before a jury. Rules against officers of the court for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Read Phosphate Co. v. Weichselbaum Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Reynolds v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Hixon v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Parker v. HarlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Aiken v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dowis v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Aiken v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Able v. Consolidated Loan & Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Aiken v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Dowis v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964