Meyers v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GONZALEZ, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. The jury found appellant guilty but found the enhancement paragraphs not true. Punishment was assessed at fifteen years confinement. We reverse on the basis that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. 1
FACTS
On June 24, 1980, two narcotics detectives and a uniformed officer obtained a search warrant for the apartment where appellant was residing. The warrant was executed sometime between 8:00 and 9:00 o’clock in the morning. Appellant and a woman, Tammy…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Oaks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Rhyne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Dubry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Sewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Forbes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- East v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Ex Parte Stowe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- Tate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Joshua v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Markham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.