Legal Opinion
MATTER OF DORMAN v. New Process Gear Div. Chrysler Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 20, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
35 N.Y.2d 975 (1975)
In the Matter of the Claim of Martha Dorman, Respondent,
v.
New Process Gear Division Chrysler Corporation, Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued January 8, 1975.
Decided January 20, 1975.
George R. Wolff for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Jorge L. Gomez, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG. Taking no part: Judge COOKE.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Claim of Dorman v. New Process Gear Division Chrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burlingame v. Mobil Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Claim of Dapp v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Claim of Pearson v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Claim of Zengotita v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Claim of Orientale v. Marcus Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.