Legal Opinion

Doll v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 25, 1943No. Docket No. 107866Published

1. Prior to December 15, 1932, the petitioner was engaged as a sole proprietor in the business of selling shoes on a commission basis. On December 15, 1932, the petitioner and his wife signed a writing wherein they purported to enter into a partnership for the conduct of the business, with the petitioner to have the management of the business to do as he should see fit.

Read the full summary

1. Prior to December 15, 1932, the petitioner was engaged as a sole proprietor in the business of selling shoes on a commission basis. On December 15, 1932, the petitioner and his wife signed a writing wherein they purported to enter into a partnership for the conduct of the business, with the petitioner to have the management of the business to do as he should see fit. Thereafter the business was conducted in much the same manner as before, with the wife as a salaried employee and the petitioner reporting in his income tax returns the entire profit from the business. After the income for…

1Opinion of the Court

Francis Doll, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Doll v. Commissioner

Docket No. 107866

United States Tax Court

2 T.C. 276; 1943 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 123;

June 25, 1943, Promulgated

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

1. Prior to December 15, 1932, the petitioner was engaged as a sole proprietor in the business of selling shoes on a commission basis. On December 15, 1932, the petitioner and his wife signed a writing wherein they purported to enter into a partnership for the conduct of the business, with the petitioner to have the management of the business to do as he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Doll v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API