Parker v. Day
Superior Court of Buffalo
Appeal from a j udgment in favor of plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
The parties to this action are lawyers, and the plaintiff is admitted to practice his profession in the state of Michigan. They became partners on May 1, 1887, with offices in this city. The copartnership was to continue from year to year, subject to termination on April 30th in any year, on one month’s notice. The firm was dissolved May 1, Í890. In June, 1887, the defendant qualified as executor of the last will and testament of Adeline C. Hotchkiss, deceased, in the state of Michigan. The estate of Mrs. Hotchkiss was worth, perhaps, $60,000. Claims to a large amount were made against the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Molloy v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882