Legal Opinion

M. v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 23, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01108Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 A.M., Case No.: 19-CV-1108 TWR (AGS) 12 Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 12) 16 17 Presently before the Court is Defendant the United States of America’s Motion to 18 Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Mot.,” ECF No. 12), as well as Plaintiff 19 A.M.’s Partial Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 16) and Defendant’s Reply in Support of 20 (“Reply,” ECF No. 18) the Motion. After the Honorable…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API