State v. Fields
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MALLARD, Chief Judge.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to support the finding that the defendant had wilfully and intentionally violated the terms of the probationary judgments is without merit.
Defendant contends that the sentence for non-support should run concurrently with the other sentences. The Attorney General does not disagree. When the defendant was sentenced on the charge of non-support of his minor children, the trial judge did not provide that the sentence was to run consecutively. In the case at bar separate sentences were pronounced on each of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. EfirdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PaigeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. McCcotterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. PittsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975