Legal Opinion

Morgenthau v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered on or about November 1, 1993, which, in a forfeiture proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 13-A, denied plaintiff District Attorney’s motion to quash defendants’ subpoenas directing two prosecution witnesses in the underlying criminal action to testify before a Special Referee at a hearing previously ordered in connection with the District Attorney’s application for an attachment of the proceeds or substituted proceeds of defendants’ alleged crimes, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Preliminarily, we agree with the District…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Cunningham v. NadjariNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Morgenthau v. CookeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Kuriansky v. Bed-Stuy Health Care Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. General Electric Co. v. RabinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. DoeNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Dillon v. FarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Morgenthau v. EliopoulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API