Legal Opinion
Redwine v. Frizzell
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 13, 1937No. 11904PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
After a general demurrer to a petition lias been sustained and the cause dismissed by the superior court, and that judgment is affirmed by the Supreme Court, without direction • or condition, the petition is not thereafter amendable. Central R. Co. v. Paterson, 87 Ga. 646 (13 S. E. 525) ; City of Rome v. Sudduth, 121 Ga. 420 (49 S. E. 300); McRae v. Sears, 183 Ga. 133 (187 S. E. 664). It makes no difference that the amendment is offered before the remittitur from the Supreme Court is made the judgment of the lower court. Kehr v. Floyd, 135 Ga. 424 (69 S. E. 550).
Judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. PatersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- City of Rome v. SudduthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Kehr v. Floyd & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- McRae v. SearsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Simpson v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Durham v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Duvall v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Helmly v. SchultzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Jones v. West End Theatre Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957