Legal Opinion

Karr v. Cockerham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 30, 1934No. 4218PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice.

The appellant, as plaintiff below, filed this ■suit against appellees, O. D. Cockerham and wife, Hester L. Cockerham, to set aside three alleged fraudulent conveyances made by Cockerham to his wife on August 5, 1930, and to subject the real estate therein conveyed to the payment of a judgment which he had recovered against O. D. Cockerham.

The material facts alleged are that on or about the 5th day of August, 1930, with the intent to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors, among which was the plaintiff, Cocker-ham executed three deeds, naming his wife as grantee, in which…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. International-Great Northern R. v. CaseyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Archibald v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Brooks v. ChathamTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  5. O'Brien v. WoeltzTexas Supreme Court · 1900

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Yates v. Home Building & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Jefferson County Investment & Building Ass'n v. GaddyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Karr v. CockerhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. In Re PoerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API