Legal Opinion
Wright v. Wright
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 11, 1969No. Civ. 33414PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
dismissing a complaint filed by appellants to recover from respondent, Margaret Royster Wright, as executrix of the will of her deceased husband, Gilbert M. Wright, the sum of $10,000. Appellants, Leta B. Deery and Philip B. Wright, are the first wife of Gilbert and the adult son of Gilbert and Leta. Respondent, Margaret, was Gilbert’s second wife. The other respondent is Barbara Wright Kalckar, the adult daughter of Gilbert and Leta, and the sister of Philip.
The action before us is based on a paragraph in a property settlement agreement made in November 1936 between Leta and Gilbert in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Waxman v. Citizens Nat. Trust & Sav. Bk. of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Cooper v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by5 opinions
- Murphy v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Sandra Joanne Murphy, Plaintiff-Third Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross v. The Travelers Insurance Company, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Barbara A. Murphy, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minors Lee S. Murphy, Etc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Kulmacz v. New York Life Ins. Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1983
- Kulmacz v. New York Life InsuranceConnecticut Superior Court · 1983
- Gunn v. United Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982