Legal Opinion

Moppar v. Wiltchik

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the Municpal Court of the city of Hew York, fourth district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

1Per curiam

This action was brought to recover damages to merchandise injured by the leakage of water from pipes which were being placed in premises leased by the plaintiff by a contractor employed by the defendants. We should not be inclined to disturb this judgment were it not that it appeared upon the trial that the plaintiff was not the sole owner of the injured property. The proof shows that the plaintiff’s son, one-Louis Moppar, was a partner with plaintiff and that the copartnership owned the damaged goods.

The pleadings were oral, and consequently the defect of parties could not be taken advantage…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Worms v. LakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Clark v. DadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API