Legal Opinion

People v. Honeycutt

California Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1946No. Crim. 4728PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendant was charged with the murder of Florence Honeycutt, his wife, and with two prior convictions of felony. He pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity and admitted the prior convictions. A jury found that he was guilty, made no recommendation as to penalty, and found that he was sane at the time the offense was committed. This is an automatic appeal from the judgment imposing the death penalty. (Pen. Code §1239, subd. (b).) Defendant contends, and his contention is correct, that the instructions as to what constitutes murder of the first (as opposed to murder of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. GorshenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. RobillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. EggersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. TuthillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API