Legal Opinion

Sturdevant Bros. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1901No. 10,060PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Keysor, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, C.

This action was brought upon an undertaking in replevin, executed in the name of the defendant bank by its cashier. Trial was had to the court, without a jury, and the plaintiff prosecutes error from a judgment in favor of the defendant. The facts are substantially undisputed, and the only questions argued relate to their legal effect. At the time the undertaking in question was given, the deL fendant was a corporation organized under the state banking act. There were five stockholders: J. H. Armstrong, owning fifty-five shares; W. W. Wood, twenty shares; one Weeter, a non-resident,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western National Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Cashier v. White Line Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Express Co. v. Citizens State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Federal Trust Co. v. DamronNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Tracy Loan & Trust Co. v. Merchants' BankUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hayes v. State Ex Rel. Oldroyd MacHine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API