Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Hemphill

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 2, 1958No. 37216PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

A provision in a contract for the sale of realty which provides that, “The purchase price of said property shall be: Fifty-two' thousand dollars ($52,000), to be paid as follows: Subject to terms of existing loan- (which is approx. $30,000, and int. rate suitable to purchaser). All cash to be paid above loan,” is too indefinite and uncertain to identify any particular loan and fails to disclose the ternrs of payment of the purchase price and the contract, therefore, is unenforceable at law (Morgan v. Hemphill, 214 Ga. 555, 105 S. E. 2d 580), and a real-estate broker cannot…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. HemphillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. Brown v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Hicks v. StuckiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Kenerly v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. NORTH FULTON REALTY CO., INC. v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Sprayberry v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API