Legal Opinion

People v. Stuckey

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 2009No. C057782PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

As we shall explain in a moment, defendant Gary Wayne Stuckey was convicted of a variety of drug offenses.

In hopes of being reinstated on probation and avoiding prison, defendant asked the trial court to appoint a psychotherapist and a drug treatment counselor to help him present addiction treatment options at the sentencing hearing. The trial court denied defendant’s motions, stating that it did not need expert testimony to help make the sentencing choice in this case. At the conclusion of a sentencing hearing in which defense counsel and defendant himself vigorously…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. CatalanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. Chico CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. DautermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. People v. Faber CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. Fin. Cas. & Sur., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API