Legal Opinion

Backes v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1938No. Appeal, 221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The sole question involved in this appeal is whether the claimant’s husband, Harry G. Backes, was at the time of his accidental death engaged in interstate transportation. Are his rights fixed by the Federal Employers’ Liability Act or by the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act under which this claim is made? The referee and board found that decedent was not engaged in interstate transportation and on appeal to the court of common pleas the majority of that court were of the opinion he was so engaged. If the employee at the time of the accident was engaged in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. BezueSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Niblett v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Miller v. Lehigh Valley Rr. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API