Legal Opinion

Mirkovic v. Tenasys Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 2026No. A185106Published

1Opinion of the Court

70 April 1, 2026 No. 233 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Ana MIRKOVIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TENASYS CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent. Washington County Circuit Court 23CV01681; A185106 Andrew Erwin, Judge. Argued and submitted January 8, 2026. Shenoa Payne argued the cause for appellant. Also on the briefs was Shenoa Payne Attorney at Law PC. Aurelia Erickson argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief was Chenoweth Law Group, PC. Lindsey Burrows and O’Connor Weber LLC and Rian Peck and Visible Law LLC filed the brief amicus curiae for Oregon Trial Lawyers…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Beneficial Oregon, Inc. v. BivinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Burley v. Clackamas Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Fields v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API