Legal Opinion

Paige v. Police Department of Schenectady

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 5, 2001No. Docket No. 00-9584PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Maryanne Sheldrick Paige appeals the decision by the district court (Hurd, J.) granting summary judgment to defendants on the grounds that the statute of limitations on her 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986 claims had expired. We affirm the decision of the district court.

BACKGROUND

Appellant Maryanne Sheldrick Paige instituted this action on April 2, 1997, alleging causes of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986. Paige contends that twenty years ago, when she was twelve years old, Schenectady police officer Michael Guthinger sexually assaulted her. Paige also alleges that members…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cornwell v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Pinaud v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Keating v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Michael C. Veal v. Anthony Geraci, Detective, New York City Police Department and John Doe, Police Officer, New York City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Barbara B. Butler v. New York State Department of Law, Dennis C. Vacco and William FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pearl v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Jay E. Hayden Foundation v. First Neighbor Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Pearl v. The City Of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Paige v. Police Dept. of City of SchenectadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Small v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API