Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roffler v. Spear, Leeds & Kellogg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 2004Published

1DissentWilliams, J.

This Court held, in affirming the vacatur of the initial arbitration award in this matter, that the arbitrators’ award, which, without explanation, provided monetary relief to individual claimants for damage suffered by a corporation, was made in manifest disregard of the law by an arbitration panel that exceeded its authority (Matter of Spear, Leeds & Kellogg v Bullseye Sec., 291 AD2d 255 [2002]).

The arbitrators’ subsequent rendering, presently before us, of an identical award with a cursory explanation of their reasoning, is not sufficient to cure the award’s essential fault, namely, that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Halligan v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Guy A. Matteson, Iii v. Ryder System Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. Spear, Leeds & Kellogg v. Bullseye Securities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Sands Bros. & Co. v. Generex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API