Legal Opinion

Campanaro v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order of the City Court of Yonkers reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the prima facie ease made by the plaintiff, by the offering of the policy in evidence, was overcome when substantial evidence was offered by the defendant to the effect that the age of the insured was eleven years greater than that stated in the policy. (Potts v. Pardee, 220 N. Y. 431, 433.) The plaintiff offered no further evidence, as she might have done by showing the age of the insured by competent witnesses and by information…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Winter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Commonwealth v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goell v. United States Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Woltin v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938
  3. Pawliuk v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Schnurman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API