Legal Opinion
Fox v. Fox
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1985No. 8546PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Kay’s petition for an increase in child support from ex-husband Dean, a Louisiana resident, was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. We proposed summary affirmance pursuant to NMSA 1978, Crim., Child.Ct., Dom.Rel. & W/C App.Rule 207(d) (Repl.Pamp.1983). We are not persuaded by Kay’s memorandum in opposition and affirm the trial court’s dismissal.
The undisputed facts as recited in Kay’s docketing statement are as follows:
A. Dean Fox is a resident of Mandeville, Louisiana and Kay Fox is a resident of Bernalillo County, New Mexico.
B. The parties were divorced in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kumar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Miller v. KiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Tarango v. PastranaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Allen v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tercero v. ROMAN CATH. DIOCESE OF NORWICHNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Whiting v. HoganDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Walker v. THI OF NEW MEXICO AT HOBBS CENTERDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Silver v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2009
- Tercero v. ROMAN CATH. DIOCESE OF NORWICHNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002