Legal Opinion

Flowers v. Blackbeard Sailing Club, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1994No. 933SC749PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

The location of the riparian boundary line between plaintiffs’ property and defendant’s property is crucial in plaintiffs’ trespass action. The location of that boundary was settled by the DCM as part of the permitting process. By asserting the present trespass action plaintiffs collaterally attack the DCM’s decision and seek to have the superior court realign the riparian boundary in accordance with their alleged boundary line. Without that realignment no part of defendant’s pier intrudes into plaintiffs’ riparian access area, and consequently there is no trespass. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Snow v. North Carolina Board of ArchitectureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Porter v. North Carolina Department of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. In Re the Protest of Mason Ex Rel. Proposed Lease of HuberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bryant v. HogarthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Hentz v. Asheville City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Vaccaro v. City of OmahaNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Vanwijk v. Professional Nursing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. L&S Water Power, Inc. v. Piedmont Triad Regional Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API