Legal Opinion

Brasfield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 2000No. 1489-99PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was indicted for sexual assault. On September 28, 1998, he waived trial by jury and pleaded guilty. There was no agreed recommendation of punishment from the prosecutor. The appellant testified, admitting his guilt, and answering these questions which were put by his counsel:

Q. Now you are asking the Judge to consider deferred adjudication; is that right?

A. Yes.

Q. You’re also asking him to, if it’s possible, to not have you register as a sex offender?

A. Yes.

Q. You understand the law mandates that. Are you asking the Judge also to permit you to appeal the constitutionality of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Jack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Brasfield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brasfield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  2. Reginald Callis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
  3. Reginald Callis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
  4. Robogistics, LLC v. Dematic Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API