Legal Opinion

Holmes Co. v. Foret

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 20, 1956No. 42446PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

Plaintiff, Holmes Company, appeals from a judgment of the trial court, which decreed the manner in which an amount deposited by the defendant in the registry of the court should be distributed between plaintiff and defendant.

Defendant, Dillard Foret, asks this Court to affirm the judgment in all respects, with the exception of the allowance of attorney’s fees to plaintiff.

As a predicate in this suit we adopt the following well-stabilized jurisprudence of this Court that where the trial judge has seen, heard, and observed the witnesses and the many things that transpire in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. GauthierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Nalty v. NaltySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. Olivier v. AbunzaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Galloway v. Employers Mutual of WausauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Holmes Company v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. Gilbert v. HeintzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  5. Blanchard v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API