Calhoun County Bank v. Ellison
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentLovins, Judge
As an abstract statement of law, I agree with point 6 of the syllabus herein. However, I can not agree with the reasoning in the opinion of the Court that the law stated in point 6 of the syllabus is applicable to the facts presented by the record in this case. In other words, I think that Edna Lockard was qualified to testify as to her transactions with William M. Ellison. In that respect this opinion is written.
At common law a person interested in the outcome of an action, suit or proceeding was under a disability to testify as a witness therein. But such disability, with certain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tavenner v. BarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Seabright v. SeabrightWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
- Crothers' Adm'r v. CrothersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gilmer's Adm'r v. Baker's Adm'rWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Anderson v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.