Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose A. Tejeda, United States of America v. Daniel L. Dropik
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 7, 2007No. 06-1492, 06-1622PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
The two cases we consider today are related only by the issue they raise: whether plain error exists if a district judge delegates too much authority to a probation agent over drug tests to be given a defendant during his term of supervised release.
Jose Tejeda entered a guilty plea to possession with the intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1) and 852. He was sentenced to a term of 120 months imprisonment to be followed by 8 years of supervised release. The district judge entered as a special condition of supervised release that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. PadillaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Domingo BlountCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Tony SparkmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Charles GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.