Legal Opinion · Dissent

Home Indemnity Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 2, 1978Published

1Dissent

Herlihy, J. (dissenting).

While questions of indemnity and the duty to defend often involve issues of "notice” and prompt disclaimer as per the policy provisions, there are also cases which involve the fundamental question of when the policy extends coverage. The present case falls into this latter group.

The policy herein extends coverage as to the operation of nonowned vehicles but only as an excess carrier. In the case of Matter of Allcity Ins. Co. v Sioukas (51 AD2d 525, affd on opn below 41 NY2d 872) it was noted that a notice of disclaimer was not necessary unless it was first established…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between Allcity Insurance & SioukasNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & SioukasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API