Legal Opinion

King County v. Whittlesey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1909No. 5699PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Wilmon Tucker, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered August 2, 1904, upon ' granting a nonsuit, after a trial before the court without a jury, dismissing an action upon an official bond.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought by King county against C. F. Whittlesey, ex-county treasurer of the county, and the sureties on his official bond, to recover an alleged shortage of funds during his first term as treasurer. The shortage was alleged at $28,004.94. The case was tried to a judge pro tempore, without the intervention of a jury. After the county had introduced its evidence and rested its case, the defendants moved the court for a nonsuit. This motion was granted, upon the ground that the evidence of a shortage was “incorrect and unreliable in such a multitude of particulars that it could…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Great Northern Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Duteau v. BartoWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. May v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Williams v. Yellow Pine Box & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Becker v. SauveurWashington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API