State v. Boyd

Elizabeth Mattingly, Judge.

Defendant Charla Boyd is charged with permitting drug abuse in violation of Cincinnati Municipal Code 911.5(A).

This matter came on for hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress evidence allegedly gained as the result of an illegal search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. The parties have stipulated that there was no warrant. Thus, the state of Ohio has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that its search herein was constitutional. The *22defendant asserts that the search in question does not meet constitutional…