Burque v. Naugatuck Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The principal point presented by the appeal is whether, as the appellants contend, the plaintiff’s lien, for which the bond was substituted, was invalid in that it attempted to secure, by a single certificate, the unpaid balance due him for labor performed, under a single contract of employment, upon two buildings, a dwelling-house and a five-car garage, both situated on the lot of land described in the certificate.
The mechanic’s lien statutes (General Statutes, § 5105 et seq.) are not to be construed with unreasonable strictness but fairly and reasonably so as to carry out their remedial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sachs v. NussenbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Balch v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- New Haven Orphan Asylum v. James A. Haggerty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Parsons v. KeeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Quinebaug Reservoir Co. v. Town of UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- J. C. Penney Properties, Inc. v. Peter M. Santella Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Corden v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- First Constitution Bank v. Harbor Village Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hartlin v. CodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Biller v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.