Amick v. O'Hara
Indiana Supreme Court
ENRON to the Clark Circuit. Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
J.— O’Hara brought an action of trespass for an injury done to liis mare by the defendant; Plea, not guilty. *275Verdict for tlie plaintiff. Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the verdict.
The evidence shows the following fact's: The defendant had a field in which corn was growing, inclosed by a good fence. The defendant, finding the plaintiff’s mare in the field late at night, set his dogs on her, one a small dog, the other a large, fierce one, and thus drove her out of the field. The mare was bit in the nose by one of the dogs, and in running from them, had a snag run into her,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bizzell v. BookerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. EyserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Miller v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
- Simonds v. HooverIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.