Legal Opinion

Amick v. O'Hara

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1842PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ENRON to the Clark Circuit. Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

J.— O’Hara brought an action of trespass for an injury done to liis mare by the defendant; Plea, not guilty. *275Verdict for tlie plaintiff. Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the verdict.

The evidence shows the following fact's: The defendant had a field in which corn was growing, inclosed by a good fence. The defendant, finding the plaintiff’s mare in the field late at night, set his dogs on her, one a small dog, the other a large, fierce one, and thus drove her out of the field. The mare was bit in the nose by one of the dogs, and in running from them, had a snag run into her,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bizzell v. BookerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. EyserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
  3. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Miller v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  5. Simonds v. HooverIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API