Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Hamersley
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided September 5, 1934PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Delehanty, S.
In paragraph thirteenth of his will decedent provided: “With regard to the mode of investment of'the said Trust estates, I provide that it shall be lawful for my Executors or the Trust Company or other institution executing such trusts to continue any investment which I may have made or which may exist at my decease, and that they may make further or future investments of the trust shares or any portion of them according to their best judgment, and without responsibility (except for gross negligence or bad faith) in any of the following stocks or securities which may be approved…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- In Re the Accounting of OsborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Robertson v. . De BrulatourNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- United States Trust Co. v. . HeyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Clarkson v. ClarksonNew York Supreme Court · 1855
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. PerelesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- In re the Accounting of Bankers Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1953
- Chase National Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- Bowden v. Citizens Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.