Legal Opinion

Hoag v. City of Detroit

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1950No. 11189PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The above cause came on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel. Appellants maintained that, in a collision between two motor vehicles, appellee was guilty of negligence, as a matter of law, in stopping its passenger coach on the paved or traveled part of a public highway in order to take on a passenger, inasmuch as it was practicable to stop off such part of the highway. The pertinent Michigan statute Comp.Laws 1948, § 256.326, provides that outside the limits of any city or village, it is unlawful to stop, park, or leave a motor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gillis v. Keystone Mut. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tcp Industries, Inc. v. Uniroyal, Inc., Donald C. FresneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Dennis C. Sours v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. Maud Prater v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  4. Southern Railway Company v. Willie Sula Brown JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  5. Cendak Agri-Service, Inc. v. HausmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API