Illinois Central Railroad v. Peery
Supreme Court of the United States
error to the supreme court oe the state of MINNESOTA. The cAse is-stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This is an action brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act to recover for personal injuries caused by a rear end collision in Kentucky. The Railroad Company denied that the case was governed by the federal act, contending that the train upon which the plaintiff was moving was engaged in local business only, between two points within the State. The issue was important as affecting the rules of law to be applied. At a second trial the judge intending to follow the previous decision of the Supreme. Court of the State, 123 Minnesota, 264, ruled that the accident happened in interstate…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Castonguay v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Patterson v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Wise v. Lehigh Valley R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Chunes v. Duluth, W. & P. RY. CO.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1923
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.