Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Sears Roebuck and Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 19, 1963No. 14104PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Justice.

A. M. Dunn, the father of Daniel Bruce Dunn, brought suit individually and as next friend of his son against Sears Roebuck and Co. and V. L. Martin, to recover damages resulting from injuries sustained by the son when his bicycle and a panel truck belonging to Sears Roebuck and Company and driven by its employee, V. L. Martin, were in collision. The jury acquitted Martin of any act of negligence; found Dunn was not in a position of peril prior to the occurrence in question; found Dunn failed to keep his bicycle under proper control and that this was a proximate cause of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. AndradeTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Bailey v. American General Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Continental Bus System, Inc. v. BiggersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Tudor v. TudorTexas Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  2. in Re: Zimmer, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  3. Collins v. GladdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Martin v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Baucum v. Statewide Hot ShotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API