Legal Opinion
State v. Oakley
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 1991No. 18360PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Judge.
Robert James Oakley entered a conditional guilty plea, pursuant to I.C.R. 11, to one count of manufacture of a controlled substance (marijuana), I.C. § 37-2732(a)(l)(B), reserving his right to appeal the orders of the district court denying his motions to dismiss and motions to suppress. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
Oakley was arrested without a warrant on January 23, 1988, after a search of his residence and other buildings on the property revealed several pounds of marijuana and evidence of a marijuana growing and processing operation. Earlier the same day, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. David Taketa and Thomas O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- State v. CrawfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MorrisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
- Piro v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1999