Legal Opinion

Comess v. United States

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 10, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 7161-NPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MaeKENZIE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action to challenge the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination that they should have reported as taxable income a $5,-000.00 note that the plaintiff, Morris Comess, received in 1963 in exchange for preferred stock he held in Paramount Bedding Corporation (Paramount). At the time of the transaction in question, Morris Comess was Vice-President and an owner of twenty-five per cent (25%) of the common stock of Paramount. The government claims *1217that the $5,000.00 is taxable as a redemption essentially equivalent to a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Eva D. Bradbury v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
  3. Keefe, Collector v. CoteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
  4. Charles P. Ballenger, Jr., and Myrtle S. Ballenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  5. Golwynne v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API