Legal Opinion

State v. Essex

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2007No. 040098GM, 040099GM, 040129VM; A128841, A128842, A128843PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, for discarding refuse in waters of the state, ORS 164.775(2), based on an incident in which he bit through his in-use fishing line, allowing the line and the tackle attached to it to fall into the Columbia River. Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal of that charge on the ground that the line and tackle were not “refuse” regulated by the statute. We affirm.

When reviewing the denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. TurleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. CorciliusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. BacaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. BacaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API