Spinks v. State

Smith, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of selling marijuana. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in refusing to declare a mistrial after a witness stated that he bought marijuana from appellant on occasions unrelated to the present prosecution. Appellant also contends that his conviction was improper because it resulted from entrapment. Finding no merit in either contention, we affirm the conviction.

1. The trial court did not err in refusing to declare a mistrial in this case. In response to a question by the prosecuting attorney asking whether the witness had been…