Legal Opinion

Randrup v. Schroeder

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 15, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

'Appeal from judgment rendered by Judicial District Court in favor of the p’ the justice of the Tenth aintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The claim in suit was for the amount of agreed compensation alleged to be due to the plaintiff because of his successful efforts, as a real estate broker, in bringing about an exchange of the defendant’s property, Ho. 1982 Bathgate avenue in this city, for certain lots owned by one "Wittiger in the city of Yonkers, but there appears to have been no sufficient evidence that this broker was the procuring cause of the exchange-and the judgment is, therefore, infirm' and cannot bé sustained.

The defendant owned three adjoining houses on Bathgate avenue, known by the street numbers 1982, 1984 and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Randrup v. SchroederAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API