Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Wollaston Alloys, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 30, 1979No. Civ. A. 79-827-ZPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
ZOBEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff petitioned, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(d), for an adjudication of contempt against defendants for an alleged refusal of defendants to comply with an administrative search warrant. Defendants moved to quash the warrant.
Defendants deny the charge of contempt. They contend that they acceded to the search insofar as it was authorized by the warrant, but that certain requests of plaintiff’s compliance officers exceeded the express terms of the warrant. They also attack the validity of the warrant on the ground that it was improperly issued…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Pool Offshore Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1979
- Marshall v. North American Car Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Matter of Establishment Inspection of Kulp Foundry, Inc. Appeal of Kulp Foundry, Inc. In 81-2450. Appeal of Secretary of Labor in 81-2451Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Wollaston Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Burkart Randall Division of Textron, Inc. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Donovan v. Metal Bank of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- 8 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1467, 1980 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,505 Burkart Randall Division of Textron, Inc., a Corporation v. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.